Skip to content

Policy Matters: Vote-by-Mail

Policy Matters: Scott Allard's Ballots Research

Evans faculty Scott Allard shares why policies around vote-by-mail matter.

Vote-by-Mail System

Voting is one of the most common and important ways we participate in civil society and the political process. Many of us see this as our civic duty. And in Washington State, we vote by mail and have been voting fully by mail for more than a decade. It’s an essential part of how we determine who leads our state and communities, how we fund our schools, and how we set priorities for policymakers.

Butc ompared to in-person voting, vote-by-mail requires voters to not just complete their ballot, but to properly sign their ballot envelope.

About two weeks before each election, registered voters in Washington voters receive ballot materials in the mail. These materials include the ballot itself, a security sleeve, and the return envelope. Each ballot and ballot envelope is linked to a specific registered voter. Once a voter completes their ballot, they place it in the envelope, seal the envelope, and are instructed to sign the envelope to verify their identity. With these steps completed, the voter then returns the ballot to their county election office through the mail or at a drop box location. To be counted, ballots must be postmarked by election day or dropped in a ballot box by 8pm on election day.

Ballot Secuirty

To maintain a secure and strong vote by mail system, it is essential that county election offices verify the identity of each ballot received – linking it to its correct registered voter. And in Washington, as do other states, it is the voter’s signature on the ballot envelope that is used to verify identity.

We might ask why do we use signatures? Aren’t there other ways to use technology to verify identity, as we do in other settings – things like two-factor identification? These are good questions, but at this point voter signatures seem to be the most accurate and equitable way to verify ballots are being cast by their proper registered voter. We gather signatures at the point of voter registration and county election offices can use sophisticated digital signature matching techniques to ensure voter identity. Other options that rely on technology may not be as accessible to all voters – and election officials worry that would disproportionately harm certain voters, such as those who are older or who do not have a smartphone.

But signatures verification requires us to remember to sign our ballot and to sign it in a manner that matches our registration signature on file. And, each year, about 1 percent of all voters forget to sign their ballots or return the envelope with a signature doesn’t quite match what is on file. In these cases, the voter receives an invitation to “cure” or fix your ballot – typically within a few days of casting the ballot. If you receive a cure notice, you have until about two weeks after the election to cure your ballot in a process that essentially involves providing a signature and verifying you are the registered voter. And roughly 60 percent of voters who receive a cure notice follow-up and correct their ballot signature.

Challenges with Vote-by-Mail

So, what’s the problem? Voters do a great job. WA State’s vote by mail system is a national leader. County election offices are recognized for the excellence of their work.

First, several thousand ballots ultimately aren’t cured by the voter. Several thousand more are received late and aren’t counted. We want to ensure that voters who are trying to exercise their civic duty have the best chance of having their ballots counted. And, we can find examples everywhere of how every vote counts. Our state and communities have many many examples where an election, or a school bond vote, or a ballot initiative passed by just a few votes.

Ballots and Public Policy

It is at this point, after a ballot has been cast, where I think public policy, research, and our core values as a society really come in. In 2022, the Evans School started working with the Washington State Legislature and the Secretary of State’s office to examine the voter experience and find ways to improve that experience. In effect, what can we learn from data and voters to reduce signature challenges and to help voters to remember to get their ballots in on time.

We first looked at the data. Several important trends showed up. First, younger voters are 4 times more likely than older voters to leave an unsigned or mismatched ballot uncured. Similarly, voters of color are about twice as likely as non-Hispanic White voters. Importantly, we didn’t see much evidence that rural voters were more or less likely to have ballots challenged or rejected than urban voters.

So, we started to consider why we might see these patterns. We spoke to election officials, we spoke to voters – and a few things stood out. Many voters are unaware that their signature is being matched to what is on their voter registration – which most commonly is our driver’s license signature in Washington because most people register to vote at the DOL. This means people may not be signing with intention or may be signing with a nickname or shortened name. And, in today’s world, we realized that most of us don’t really sign our names pen to paper as we might have – often we are using fingers on touchscreens to sign our names.

We also found that ballot envelopes and voter materials could be improved to help reduce signature issues on ballots. For example, not all materials may be translated in a voter’s preferred language. The ballot envelopes themselves vary across the state. So, there is room to use human-centered design principles to improve how those envelopes help to remind voters to sign their ballot envelopes.

Finally, voters often don’t realize that they can use technology to ensure their ballot is processed. We can sign up for email or mobile text alerts in many cases, and we can track the path of our ballot at VoteWA.gov.

The last issue we encountered related to late ballots, which is often the most common reason ballots are not counted. Here, we found that primary and off-year general elections saw higher numbers of ballots being returned late compared to presidential elections. This makes sense, at some level, people vote with more intensity in presidential years – but it also suggests there are opportunities to remind voters about election day deadlines. We also found that some ballots are placed in the mail too close to election day to be postmarked on time.

Research Takeways

Three key takeaways seemed to emerge from our research – commonsense tips to help us all exercise our civic duty:

  1. Sign your ballot
  2. Sign your driver’s license signature
  3. Get your ballot in early and follow it on VoteWA.gov

There is a bit more. We worked with the Center for Civic Design to use human centered design principles to improve the ballot envelope – like having the seal and the signature box on the same side, and having the signature box be larger and directions clearer. Since voters can receive ballot materials in a language they prefer, we also encourage policymakers to think about how all aspects of the process can have translated materials. We also know that counties can continue to advance efforts invite voters to opt into text message and email notices about their ballot status.

In the end, efforts to improve the voter experience give us more confidence in our election system. And, as importantly, improving the voter experience ensures that our voices shape the decisions that matter most to our communities and families.

Learn more about the Vote-by-Maill Research

Reducing Child Marriage Through Community Intervention

An empty classroom with wooden desks and a blackboard

Evans faculty Isabelle Cohen co-authored an article in the journal Nature that looks at how a northern Nigerian program is helping to dramatically reduce child marriage rates. “Pathways to Choice” is a woman and Nigerian-led program run by the Centre for Girls Education that uses a range of community approaches to support girls schooling. By working with engaged community and religious leaders, the Pathways program provides girls with safe-space groups, remedial education, and help reenrolling in school or vocation training.

Isabelle brought her background as an economist with nearly fifteen years’ experience working in developing countries to figure out how best to conduct quality research and evaluate the program’s impact. The research team surveyed 1,181 unmarried girls between 12 and 17 years-old across 18 communities before half of communities were randomized into the program in 2018, then surveyed the same girls again after the program had ended in 2020. They found that 79% of girls in communities that participated in the program remained unmarried, compared with only 13.8% in communities who did not.

Isabelle and her colleagues concluded that the Pathways program increased the perceived value of girls’ education and reduced the stigma of delaying marriage. With more than 12 million girls marrying before the age of 18 every year, leading to less schooling and autonomy and greater health risks around childbirth, the results from the Pathways program offer promising solutions.

Currently, variations of Pathways are being tested in 40 communities in Kaduna State in Nigeria to further inform cost-efficient scale. The Centre for Girls Education is partnering with CARE to adapt the program in neighboring Niger. Both projects are funded by the Gates Foundation.

Read the Policy Brief

Dean’s Forum: Learning from the Past

Dean's Forum Logo

How Immigration Policy Affects Communities

On February 26, 2026, Dean Jodi Sandfort hosted a conversation with panelists Dafeng Xu (Evans School) and Catherine Clement about the past efforts to curb immigration in North America and how those policies impacted communities, families, labor markets, and social relations. 

Event Speakers

Dean Jodi Sandfort

Jodi Sandfort

Dean and Professor

Daniel J. Evans School of Public Policy & Governance

Dafeng Xu

Dafeng Xu

Assistant Professor

Daniel J. Evans School of Public Policy & Governance

Catherine Clement

Catherine Clement

Public Historian

Creator, Curator, Author of “The Paper Trail to the 1923 Chinese Exclusion Act”

Event Recording

Dean’s Forum: Public Impact Research in Action

Dean's Forum Logo

Partnering with Communities for Coastal Hazard Preparedness

On December 2, 2025, Dean Jodi Sandfort hosted a conversation with panelists Ann Bostrom (Evans School), Jenna Tilt (Oregon State University), and Maximilian Dixon (Washington Military Department’s Emergency Management Division) about the work of the Cascadia Coastlines and Peoples Hazards Research Hub. CoPes Hub is a National Science Foundation–funded initiative helping Pacific Northwest coastal communities prepare for major earthquakes and other coastal hazards. The discussion emphasized how researchers and local leaders are co-developing tools for hazard assessment, disaster mitigation planning, and long-term adaptations that are grounded in local expertise, scientific evidence, and inclusive engagement.

Event Speakers

Dean Jodi Sandfort

Jodi Sandfort

Dean and Professor

Daniel J. Evans School of Public Policy & Governance

Ann Bostrom

Ann Bostrom

Weyerhaeuser Endowed Professor in Environmental Policy

Daniel J. Evans School of Public Policy & Governance

Jenna Tilt

Jenna Tilt

Assistant Professor

College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences

Oregon State University

Maximilian Dixon

Maximilian Dixon

Earthquake Program Manager, WA Military Department’s Emergency Management Division

Washington Coastal Hazards Resilience Network

Event Recording

Conversation Resources

Tsunamis Emergency Management Division, Washington State

Preparedness Emergency Management Division, Washington State

Alter and Warning Notifications Emergency Management Division, Washington State

NVS Tsunami Evacutation Zones Map

Washington Coastal Hazards Resilience Networks

Center for Disaster Resilient Communities University of Washington

Cascadia CoPes Hub

Cascadia Subjection Zone Earthquake and Tsunami Risk Emergency Management Division, Washington State

Dean’s Forum | Seeing Through the Fog

Dean's Forum Logo

The Hidden Consequences of Executive Orders

On April 2, 2025, Dean Jodi Sandfort hosted a conversation with Ben Brunjes, from the Evans School, and Tiffany Gourley Carter, from the National Council of Nonprofits, to discuss the hidden consequences of recent federal executive orders, specifically how these changes are impacting nonprofits (here and abroad), and small businesses. This administration has relied heavily on a constant barrage of executive orders and memos to make these changes and intimidate, confuse, and disable opposition. With more than 70 executive orders in the first month alone, much of the policy conversation has been on issues like immigration, trade, and healthcare. However, the impact has been much more far-reaching.

Event Speakers

Dean Jodi Sandfort

Jodi Sandfort

Dean and Professor

Evans School of Public Policy & Governance

Ben Brunjes

Benjamin Brunjes

Associate Professor

Evans School of Public Policy & Governance

Tiffany Carter

Tiffany Gourley Carter

Public Policy Director and Counsel

National Council for Nonprofits

Event Recording

Spotlight on Bachelor’s Degree Affordability

Graduation cap sits on stack of change next to globe and books

Elizabeth Meza recently published a commentary in Community College Daily on her research around tuition and fees comparisons between bachelor’s degrees offered by community colleges and those offered by public universities and for-profit institutions. Meza finds that community college baccalaureate (CCB) programs are becoming an increasingly viable and affordable option for students seeking four-year degrees. Research across 13 states shows that CCB programs significantly reduce costs, with median tuition at $4,820 annually compared to $9,390 at public universities and $19,097 at for-profit institutions. In some states, such as Texas, CCB tuition is less than half the cost of a public university, making higher education more accessible to lower-income students. These programs serve diverse populations, particularly students of color and working adults balancing education with family and job responsibilities. While tuition models vary by state, most CCB programs maintain affordability by keeping costs close to those of associate degrees. As these programs continue to expand nationwide, they offer a pathway for students who might otherwise find a bachelor’s degree financially difficult.This research was presented at the annual Community College Baccalaureate Association Conference.

Student Consulting Lab Project on Behavioral Health Quoted in Seattle Times

The Evans School Student Consulting Lab (SCL) pairs MPA students and faculty advisors with public, private, and nonprofit partners to co-create solutions to policy and organization problems. A recent “Seattle Times” article cited research done by Brad Blackburn, Hope Kalegi, and Mahdya Aldahnim – all MPA ’23 – as part of their project “Landscape of Behavioral Health Crisis Interventions for U.S. Campus Populations.”

“Programs that send mental health professionals to respond to crises as a supplement to or replacement for police officers have grown in recent years. Seattle is planning to expand its pilot program that sends crisis responders to some 911 calls. King County recently expanded its program that sends mobile crisis teams, dispatched by 988 calls, to mental health emergencies around the county.

Applying the idea to college campuses is newer. A 2023 report from students at UW’s Evans School of Public Policy and Governance identified similar crisis response programs at eight universities around the country; the oldest program, at Johns Hopkins University, launched in August 2021.”

Read the full article

Theory to Practice: “Antiracist by Design” Book Launch

Theory to Practice logo

Theory to Practice is an ongoing series of discussions hosted by the Evans School that brings together academics and researchers at UW with practitioners in the field to explore key policy, governance, and social sector topics.

On December 11, 2024, the Evans School of Public Policy & Governance hosted our Theory to Practice: Antiracist by Design Book Launch with Associate Professor Crystal C. Hall. This thought-provoking event celebrated the launch of her powerful new book on advancing antiracist practices in policy and design.

The evening featured an engaging interview led by Charmila Ajmera, MPA ’20, who explored the book’s themes and its inspiring call to action for creating equitable systems through intentional design. The discussion illuminated the real-world implications of antiracist work and the challenges and opportunities of embedding these principles into practice.

Attendees were invited to join a dynamic Q&A session, where thoughtful questions deepened the conversation around antiracism and systemic change. This meaningful exchange set the stage for a community-driven dialogue, fostering connections and shared commitments to advancing equity in policy and governance.

Resources

Speakers

Crystal Hall joined the Evans School faculty in 2008. Her courses include Quantitative Analysis, Psychology for Policy Analysis, Intergroup Relations for Public Policy, and Race and Equity for Policy and Governance.

Her research explores decision making in the context of poverty, using the methods of social and cognitive psychology, along with behavioral economics. This work has had a particular focus on financial decision making and economic opportunity for low-income families. In addition to broadening the theoretical understanding of the behavior of this population, her work has also explored new ways of incorporating these insights into policy design and implementation. She has a record of serving government agencies at the local, state, and federal level – including having served as a Fellow on the White House Social and Behavioral Sciences Team and the Federal Office of Evaluation Sciences at the General Services Administration.

Professor Hall holds an appointment as an Adjunct Associate Professor of Psychology in the University of Washington Department of Psychology. She is also an Academic Affiliate of ideas42, an Affiliated Scientist of the Behavioral Change for Good Initiative, and a Faculty Affiliate at both the University of Washington’s West Coast Poverty Center (WCPC) and Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology (CSDE).

In addition to her scholarly work, Professor Hall has provided guidance and training to community organizations, nonprofits, and government agencies seeking to implement tools from psychology and behavioral economics into the design and delivery of their programs and services. She holds a PhD and MA in Psychology from Princeton University. In addition, she holds a BS from Carnegie Mellon University in both Decision Science and Policy and Management.

Charmila Ajmera is Environmental Justice Policy senior manager in the Environmental Public Health division of the Washington State Department of Health. Prior to joining the agency, she worked with the environmental justice coalition, Front & Centered to help draft and pass the 2021 Healthy Environment for All (HEAL) act, and served as an Inclusion Manager at Tableau and Salesforce. She has been a staunch and effective advocate for equity and anti-racist policies and practices both in her professional and academic careers for the last 15 years. Outside of work, she loves enjoying the beauty of the PNW with her 2 year old daughter, partner, and pup.

Evans faculty Crystal Hall co-authors new book on antiracist behavioral design

Antiracist by Design is a compact and informative guide for organizations, policymakers, and everyday people who want to use the tools of behavioral science in practical ways to design and implement policies and practices that drive racial equity forward.

Two Antiracist by design books with yellow covers floating in front of a pale blue background

Co-authored by Crystal Hall, an Associate Professor at the Evans School, and Mindy Hernandez, the Living Lab for Equitable Climate Action at the World Resources Institute, Antiracist by Design is a call to action, providing tools and a roadmap for an antiracist approach to applied behavioral science.

The book begins by tracing the history of applied behavioral science and how the field has historically shied away from tackling systemic issues. Hall and Hernandez then offer an antiracist framework for updating the mechanics of behavioral design, blending scholarly research alongside accessible stories, examples, and concrete steps for moving racial justice forward.

Reflecting on the process, Hall shared, “Mindy and I are thrilled for the release of Antiracist by Design. This book represents years of conversations and reflections on the missteps of the field (starting with our own!). My teaching and scholarship at the Evans School have been so influential throughout this process, especially my work with students. I’m so delighted that I’ll have the opportunity to celebrate the book and its implications with our community.”

Antiracist by Design will be released on November 19 by MIT Press. Hall will hold a hybrid book talk on December 11 as part of the Evans School’s Theory to Practice lecture series.